java soaked theological philosophy and associated blather from a spiritual nomad

Disclaimer

I am a man with a great love for my Lord, the church and her members, and for coffee, strong and black.
I also have a great love for writing.
Everything I say here is my own opinion. Why in the world would I hold someone else's opinion?

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

daily java

Daily Java:
Peter said, “We’ve left our homes to follow you.” “Yes,” Jesus replied, “and I assure you that everyone who has given up house or wife or brothers or parents or children, for the sake of the Kingdom of God, will be repaid many times over in this life, and will have eternal life in the world to come.” (Luke 18:28-30)
This passage follows the narrative of a man who came up to Jesus and asked him what else he needs to do. He had been faithful to God since he was a child. Is there anything else? Jesus told him to sell everything he had and follow Jesus. The scripture says that they man was sad because he was rich. Jesus then said that it was very difficult for rich men to get into heaven. Their wealth stood in the way. All of the other wealthy people asked who would be able to come in then?

In an interesting aside to Jesus, Peter wants encouragement that he has done the right thing. He also wants to hear Jesus say he has. When you have given up everything you have to follow Jesus, you want to know you did the right thing.

Jesus’ answer was yes, you did well.

Jesus didn’t usually compliment his disciples on things that we have recorded. But you know that they had to worry about it on occasion. Here they are, giving up good businesses and lives to follow an itinerant preacher around, a man who is always in trouble with the authorities. You know they wanted encouragement.

And Jesus gave it to them.

I read an article today by a man who was, I suppose, a speaker on church transformation and church growth in the more liberal arena. It was about young people not coming to church and the various reasons. One comment really struck me.
There's a question I ask nearly every congregation I get asked to come speak to. Before we get into any other real substance about congregational transformation, I ask them: "If you could realize your vision for the community today, right now, but it meant closing the doors of your church forever, would you do it?"
If the answer is "no," then the mission has taken a back seat to something more nefarious. If the answer is "yes," and if they are truly committed to doing WHATEVER it takes with their personal and material resources to live out the Gospel, then we have something to work with.
I'm not saying every church has to – and will – shut down forever in order to meet their new mission field's needs. But if we're not even willing to consider the possibility, it's we who have a distorted value system; and those young adults wary of our motives are actually right in their skepticism about us. (Christian Piatt, "Huffington Post," April 16, 2012)
What is important to us? Is the presence of our church building and actual physical facility so important that we will do anything to hold on to it? Most churches are not growing, and if anything are declining. Even the one I attend, even though it is a good church with a good pastor, is only moderately growing. It has taken 35 years of one man’s ministry and 75 years total for the church to grow to the less than 200 there are today.

So what is the point? What if the church here could do better by disbanding and doing something else? And what would that something else be? What would it look like? What form would it take?

When we say that we think of selling the church and wandering the streets, giving out tracts or sandwiches or something. It is almost a picture of people in robes wandering about.

But is that necessarily what it means? The whole thing boils down to one question: what is most important to us? Is our physical church so important that we will do anything whatsoever to keep it going? What if it is dying and there is no real way to resuscitate it? What if the neighborhood has changed and our church is no longer culturally relevant.

There are a lot of lone outposts of 1950’s style religion sitting in neighborhoods that have changed so dramatically. The outposts will not change and a few are paying the bills to keep the doors open. And for what

Would we give up everything for the kingdom if preaching the kingdom demanded it? Would we restructure our whole way of looking at things if the success of the kingdom required it? Would we sell all of our physical property, get rid of all our stuff, as such, if it would help in the preaching of the kingdom?

Would we close the doors of our church buildings if by so doing we would open the doors of the kingdom to others?

In my own life I have done some of that. I am not sure it was necessarily a conscious decision on my part, but it has ended up in that direction. What can I do in a world setting with no church building, no facilities, no money, to bring people to Jesus in a fulfilling way? Would such a person, a group be viable to young people?

Are we as churches just too tied to our stuff?

No comments:

Post a Comment

To comment, post your comment and click the anonymous button. It would be nice if you signed it so I could know who you are.
You are welcome to say anything you want as long as it is nice. If I don't like it, or it is ugly, I will take it off, place it into the garbage disposal, grind it up, and allow it to be flushed into the Gulf of Mexico where it will be eaten by a fish and then excreted where it will lie on the bottom of the ocean until it is covered up by other comments.